HRDF – HRD Corp Claimable AIAG-VDA FMEA – Failure Mode and Effect Analysis

HRDF HRD Corp Claimable AIAG-VDA FMEA – Failure Mode and Effect Analysis Methodology
Automotive manufacturers, tier-one suppliers, and AIAG and VDA members collaborated on this document. The AIAG & VDA manual replaces the AIAG 4th edition FMEA handbook and VDA Product and Process FMEA volume 4. While the handbook has been totally rewritten, there are numerous familiar parts and tools that we have been using for years. However, certain major FMEA process parts have been adjusted. Prevention is prioritized over detection. The FMEA process is now a seven-step system incorporating robustness tools used by many FMEA facilitators. The RPN has been replaced by an “Action Priority” method that uses tables to prioritize risk-reduction measures regardless of the number of FMEA actions identified. A “Supplemental Method for Monitoring and System Response” in the AIAG &VDA FMEA manual provides expanded risk analysis. This novel method lets practitioners assess diagnostic, detection, and fault mitigation during end-user vehicle or machine operation. The new methodology delivers better FMEAs and risks analysis and mitigation, although some practitioners may find it difficult.

AIAG and VDA have collaborated on the development of a universal FMEA format that incorporates the organization’s respective standards for quality assurance and risk management. This new method and format replace the previous AIAG FMEA Edition 4, which was previously in use. The DFMEA has undergone a number of significant revisions, including PFMEA. If you work in the automotive industry (either as an OEM or a supplier), having a comprehensive understanding of the new edition is absolutely necessary. This class is designed to bring you up to speed in the quickest and most efficient manner possible.

The HRDF HRD Corp Claimable AIAG-VDA FMEA – Failure Mode and Effect Analysis was developed with the help of a global team of subject matter experts from automotive OEMs and Tier 1 suppliers. This new handbook incorporates the best practices from both AIAG and VDA methodologies into a harmonized, structured approach.

In addition to making it easier for suppliers to meet the needs of their customers during the FMEA development process, the handbook features major changes such as a new process for FMEA development known as the 7-Step Approach and a new chapter on Supplemental FMEA for Monitoring and System Response. Both of these additions are in addition to the fact that the handbook makes it easier for suppliers to meet the needs of their customers (FMEA-MSR). The following are additional significant changes that have been made:

• The severity, Occurrence, and Detection Tables Have All Been Updated Completely.
• The RPN methodology and Tables will replace the Action Priority (AP) methodology.
• Spreadsheet users will benefit from the new form sheets and software report views (software users).
• Changepoint highlights are taken from the VDA Volume 4 FMEA Manual as well as the AIAG 4th edition FMEA Manual.

The HRDF HRD Corp Claimable AIAG-VDA FMEA – Failure Mode and Effect Analysis offers all automotive suppliers consistent direction and guidance, beginning with a heightened emphasis on function-based FMEAs and continuing with the provision of additional tools and direction to support a more robust methodology. Get a seat as soon as possible in our HRDF HRD Corp Claimable AIAG-VDA FMEA – Failure Mode and Effect Analysis

HRDF HRD Corp Claimable AIAG-VDA FMEA – Failure Mode and Effect Analysis Course Content

Step One – Preparation and Planning

• Prior to FMEA activities, the new manual contains essential information on subjects that should be evaluated and considered early in the project planning phase. This talk is intended to assist you in achieving optimal outcomes and maximising the FMEA’s value. In general, the planning phase involves selecting the project’s scope, the kind of FMEAs to be conducted (Concept, System, Sub-system, Component, etc.), the boundaries of the FMEA analysis, and the basis for the structural analysis step. In addition, the 5Ts of FMEA development must be considered during the planning and preparation phase. Following is a list of the 5Ts with brief explanations of each subject.

Step Two – Structure Analysis

• During the structural analysis step of the FMEA process, the team must establish the boundaries of the investigated design or process and define the scope of the analysis to determine which systems, subsystems, and/or components will be included in the FMEA analysis. Additionally, the interfaces and interactions of the scoped elements must be addressed. The Boundary or Block Diagram and the Structure Tree are useful tools for assessing the structure, interactions, and scope of the FMEA study.

Step Three – Function Analysis

• During this step, the functions specified by the design functions are assigned to the system elements, and the inputs, interfaces, and outputs of the function or system are reviewed. In this phase of the procedure, the P-diagram and Function tree are useful tools. Include both internal and external customer requirements. The team should also examine the relationship between specific design criteria and functional requirements. During this activity, a correlation matrix or QFD level II are suitable applications.

Step Four – Failure Analysis

• During this step, the product’s potential failure modes, effects, and causes are identified and evaluated. Failure mode is described as “the mechanism through which a product or process could fail to fulfil specifications or execute the desired purpose.” The revised standard also contains details about the “Failure Chain.” The failure chain is best described as the connections between the failure mode, the subsequent effects, and the underlying causes. It is graphically represented below. The failure chain highlights the three failure elements investigated in the FMEA exercise.

Step Five – Risk Analysis

• Risk analysis is the phase of the FMEA process in which the Severity, Occurrence, and Detection scores are evaluated in order to create and prioritise recommended actions to minimise risk. The Risk Analysis objects consist of the following, but are not limited to:

1. Evaluating the severity, occurrence, and detection rankings of each failure chain
2. Implementation of Preventive measures to address possible causes
3. Implementation of Detection controls to address possible causes and failure modes
4. Evaluation of the Priority Action
5. Occasionally initiate partnerships with suppliers and clients.
6. Lay the groundwork for the optimization phase

Contact us for HRDF HRD Corp Claimable AIAG-VDA FMEA – Failure Mode and Effect Analysis ( Corporate & Personal Coaching )

Name * First Last Phone * Email * HRDF / HRD Corp Claimable? * Yes No Do you like to claim the training courses from HRDF / HRD Corp Malaysia? HRDF / HRD Corp Claimable HRDF - HRD Corp Change Management Training Request * Submit

Call / WhatsApp +6 010 220 6800 for Corporate Training

Autogenerate Quotation for Courses

Public Class

On Site Training

Public Class

On Site Training